The Livestock Emergency — Animals as Assets and Casualties in Disasters

For millions of families in South Asia, livestock are not just animals; they are savings accounts, insurance policies, and sources of food, income, and status. When disasters strike, the maomoi loss of livestock can be as devastating as the loss of a home, destroying livelihoods and undermining recovery. The events of late September 2026 in South Asia—floods in Nepal, a bombing in Pakistan, an avalanche in the Himalayas—caused significant livestock losses that illustrate the importance of animals in disaster vulnerability and response.

In Nepal, the monsoon floods and landslides killed and injured livestock across affected districts. Cattle, goats, and chickens were swept away by floodwaters, buried under mud, or crushed in collapsed sheds. For families who depend on these animals for milk, meat, and income, the losses were catastrophic. A single cow may represent years of savings and a source of daily nutrition. Losing it can push a family from subsistence into destitution. The psychological impact of losing animals that are often treated as family members compounds the economic loss.

The situation in Pakistan is similar. The bombing at a police checkpoint in Dera Ismail Khan killed eleven people and wounded eighteen, and it also killed and injured livestock in the area. In conflict-affected regions, livestock are often the only source of income for families who cannot find work. The military operation in Balochistan, while targeting militants, also displaced civilians and their animals, disrupting pastoral livelihoods that have sustained communities for generations. The loss of livestock in such contexts is not just an economic setback; it is a threat to a way of life.

The avalanche on Himlung Himal affected families who depend on livestock for their livelihoods. In the villages where the victims’ families live, animals are often the primary source of income and nutrition. The death of a breadwinner may force families to sell their animals to pay for food and medical care, eroding their assets and making recovery more difficult. The avalanche, in other words, was not just a mountaineering disaster; it was a livestock disaster for the families left behind.

Livestock are often overlooked in disaster response, which tends to focus on human needs. But livestock are essential to human well-being, and their loss can have cascading consequences for health, nutrition, and income. Veterinary services, animal feed, and shelter for animals are rarely prioritized in emergency response, even though they are essential to protecting livelihoods and ensuring recovery. The result is that families who lose their animals may never fully recover, falling into a cycle of poverty from which escape is difficult.

Addressing the livestock emergency in disasters requires action on multiple fronts. First, animals must be included in evacuation planning, with provisions for their transport and shelter. Second, emergency veterinary services must be provided, including through mobile clinics, medicines, and vaccines. Third, animal feed must be distributed, including through fodder banks and cash transfers for feed purchases. Fourth, restocking programs must be supported, helping families replace lost animals and rebuild their herds. Fifth, livestock must be integrated into disaster risk reduction, including through resilient shelters, vaccination programs, and early warning systems.

The events of the past week are a reminder that animals are not just property; they are partners in survival for millions of people. The families who lost livestock in Nepal’s floods, Pakistan’s bombing, and the Himalayan avalanche lost more than assets; they lost a source of security, dignity, and hope. Addressing this loss is not just a matter of agricultural policy; it is a matter of humanitarian concern. The question is whether governments and international organizations will recognize the importance of livestock and act to protect them, or whether they will continue to overlook this critical dimension of disaster vulnerability. The answer will determine whether families can rebuild their livelihoods or whether they will be left with nothing.